A possible sinthesis for an incredible story.
|Translated
by Luther Blissett|
|
When
Eni is creating pollution, then public institutions do not see, do
not verify, do not intervene. This story, incredible even for the
people who lived it themselves, begins in 1996 when a spontaneous
Committee of miners in the Colline Metallifere, fighting for their
jobs and in contrast with their Unions after Eni abandoned the mining
sector, revealed that in the past toxic waste had been stored in the
Campiano mine. The waste material was then placed in a dry area, but
after the pumps had been stopped following the halting of every activity
in the mine, it was submerged and dangerous toxic metals have passed
into the water. The pollution is from mercury and arsenic, which pass
into the waters in a particularly acid environment which is in turn
produced by the metallic solphides found in abundance at surface level.
We have traced the procedure followed by Eni to obtain the necessary
authorization to store the waste material by the Regione Toscana to
and we found that the material (pyrites ashes from the Eni plant of
Scarlino), had been passed, through documents containing misleading
information and dodgy lab tests, for reusable material (even at surface
level and even in an acid environment) good both for the surface lining
of dump sites and to be used instead of quarry material in the making
of roads. The local Health Authority had indeed correctly certified
the real hazardous nature of that waste material, but local Mayors
and regional administrators had turned a blind eye. So the pyrites
ashes were scattered in huge quantity here and there in the territory
of Alta Maremma. They were mainly used to build farm roads in the
farms close to the Scarlino plant and to fill in marshland. In the
meantime the first wells of potable water had to be closed. Notwithstanding
that millions of tons of this dangerous waste still lie abandoned
under the sky, or dumped in the hollows of the Padule di Scarlino,
in contact with surface waters and on permeable ground. All this has
been documented in papers and scientific studies commissioned by the
Regione Toscana and by the magistrates. But nothing happened. We stepped
into action demanding inspections and the inclusion of such areas
in the Regional Plan for land restoration and at the end of 1997 we
obtained the inclusion of 24 sites. But the delays of the local administrations
allowed Eni to negotiate agreements with some of them (e.g. the Comune
di Scarlino or the Comunità Montana dell¹Amiata) whereby the local
administrations pay for the land restoration and in exchange receive
the ownership of the land and of the buildings existing on it now
owned by Eni. More agreements were planned and then dropped (e.g.
the one with the local administrations of the Colline Metallifere
or the one with the Regional Commissary for the Creation of a Strategy
for Waste Control). Today we can assess that in the exchange planned
the relation between the costs for land restorationand the value of
the properties that Eni was offering was ten to one. Regione Toscana
arrogantly failed to answer our requests. The same applies to the
Provincia di Grosseto. Nobody wanted to ascertain where the tons of
arsenic and mercury produced in the melting process of sulphides in
the Eni plant of Scarlino, had ended up. Nobody wanted to force Eni
to make safe its waste material, which had been proved to be toxic
and lies in the open totally unprotected. Thanks to the action of
another Committee in nearby Follonica, we succeeded to take the case
to a Parliamentary Investigation Commission on crimes connected with
waste production and disposal chaired by Mr. Scalia MP. Although this
Commission confirmed all the circumstances of our report there hasn¹t
been so far any result. Worse, Eni, forced to confront the law on
land restoration and to abandon the planned agreements decided for
a complete change of strategy and aimed at a complete discharge of
its responsibility claiming that in the hills inland metallic sulphides
naturally come to the surface. Eni managed to have the provincial
and regional Arpat certify the ³natural and ubiquitous² presence of
dangerous quantities of arsenic in the alluvial ground in the flatland
around Follonica and Scarlino. This is also false or rather it is
an artificial certification which aimed at demonstrating the ³natural
and ubiquitous² presence of the arsenic, by deliberately choosing
to analyze sites which were indeed far from the plant, but in which
Eni had in the past transported tons of pyrites ashes (used as Œquarry
material¹) and whose soils were mainly clay. Arpat goes on to certify
also the impermeability of the soil to prove that arsenic, which was
found up to the depth of 6 meters cannot have percolated from the
surface on which the ashes had been placed. Eni plants are in reality
built on lenticular strata of sand, silt, clay and shingle, typical
of the alluvial soil of recent formation, underneath which are vast
ancient riverbeds filled with shingle. The surface waters are in touch
with the ashes containing arsenic in huge quantity which dissolves
in the water and could contaminate the whole area. Such a massive
presence cannot be natural. Although we reported to all the competent
authorities and to Arpat the spreading of the pollution resulting
from the previous industrial activity and notwithstanding the existence
of highly qualified studies made in the ¹80 which ruled out a toxic
concentration of arsenic in the flatland around Follonica and Scarlino,
Eni has obtained to avoid the cost of land restoration. The pollution
of the subterranean waters goes on and more wells of potable water
which served Follonica have been closed. The local administrators,
lacking the water necessary for tourism and for the other productive
activities are looking for alternative supplies and even repropose
an old Eni project: the production of potable water from seawater
by a plant whose cost is to be borne by the collectivity and whose
energy balance would be disastrous! All this is happening nowadays
in Tuscany where Ulivo is ruling. Or rather Eni is.
|
|Contatta
l'autore| |torna alla home page| |vedi
le foto| |consulta i documenti | |leggi
le novita'|